Which scenario presents the highest potential risk related to an organization's information security policy?

The scenario in which the organization's information security policy is approved by a security administrator presents the highest potential risk primarily because it raises concerns about the adequacy of oversight and governance. When a policy is only approved by a single individual, it can indicate a lack of comprehensive review and input from various stakeholders who may provide valuable perspectives on security risks and compliance requirements.

In a well-structured information security governance framework, policies should ideally be developed and approved by a committee or group that includes representatives from different areas of the organization. This ensures that diverse viewpoints are considered, including legal, technical, operational, and business perspectives, leading to a more robust and effective policy. Relying on the approval of just one person can lead to gaps in the policy, as it may not reflect the broader organizational context or account for all potential risks.

Additionally, policies that are not subjected to collaborative review might lack necessary updates to adapt to evolving threats, regulatory changes, or operational changes within the organization. Therefore, governance and careful oversight are critical to minimizing risks related to the information security policy, making a scenario requiring approval by only a security administrator particularly concerning.