Which of the following is NOT a recommended reason to keep patient benefit data in-house?

Keeping patient benefit data in-house is primarily motivated by concerns related to data privacy and security, regulatory compliance, and operational challenges such as control and monitoring of data. Option B, which addresses training costs for staff, does not directly relate to the core reasons that organizations choose to keep sensitive data such as patient benefits within their own infrastructure.

Regulations on data privacy are crucial as healthcare organizations must comply with laws such as HIPAA in the United States, which mandate strict controls over the handling of sensitive medical information. Keeping data in-house helps ensure that organizations meet these regulatory requirements more effectively.

Challenges in monitoring remote databases also support the rationale for in-house data storage. When data is stored externally, it can become more difficult to track access and management, increasing the potential for data breaches or violations of privacy regulations.

Time zone differences affecting service could complicate support and data management tasks, but these are more operational considerations rather than core reasons underlying the decision to retain sensitive patient data internally. Essentially, keeping patient benefit data in-house is largely driven by the need to maintain control, compliance, and security rather than by the costs associated with training staff.